United States v. Robert Corrado. Robert A. Corrado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that government conceded that FYCA conviction should not be counted
• noting that government conceded that FYCA conviction should not be counted
• noting that government conceded that FYCA conviction should not be counted
• district court had applied earlier version of guidelines and defendant argued that he should have benefitted from favorable amendment in subsequent guidelines
• \to apply a change in the guidelines that enhances the penalty would offend the ex post facto clause of the United States Constitution\
• if application of guidelines in effect at sentencing results in more severe penalty than that in effect at time of offense, earlier version controls; applying a guideline amendment that enhances the penalty offends the ex post facto clause of the United States Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).