Skip to main content
· 9/18/2015

United States v. Robert Carey Evans

Citations

  • 802 F.3d 942
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 16624

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the admission of propensity evidence harmless where the jury did not hear the content of the pornographic stories and “ample properly-admitted evidence” limited the stories’ likelihood of influencing the jury’s verdict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Bye, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.