United States v. Robert C. Thetford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting reopening inappropriate because the government “was fully aware of what it had to establish to successfully oppose Kithcart’s suppression motion” and nothing suggested “that evidence was either newly discovered or unavailable during the first hearing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).