United States v. Robert C. Stiver

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding entry constitutionally reasonable because exception to federal statute validly applied
• describing the burden of showing mootness as heavy 10 and formidable
• officers executing a search warrant are \required to interpret it\ and are \not obliged to interpret it narrowly\
• officers executing a search warrant are \required to interpret it\ and are \not obliged to interpret it narrowly\
• officers executing a search warrant are “required to interpret it” and are “not obliged to interpret it narrowly”
• “Officers executing a search warrant are ‘required to interpret it,’” but “they are ‘not obliged to interpret [the warrant] narrowly.’” (quoting Hessel v. O’Hearn, 977 F.2d 299, 302 (7th Cir. 1992))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).