Skip to main content
· 3/25/1992

United States v. Robert C. Jacoby and Thomas Skubal

Citations

  • 955 F.2d 1527
  • 35 Fed. R. Serv. 224
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 5250
  • 1992 WL 43125

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that memoranda dictated by witness during closing of real estate loans left “no doubt” those documents were prepared in the course of a regularly conducted business activity
  • holding that a prosecutor’s statements during closing arguments that inconsistencies “were so glaring and so clear” that “[s]omeone is committing perjury” were neither improper nor prejudicial, albeit “colorful and perhaps flamboyant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cox, Dyer, Friedman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.