United States v. Robert C. Bentz Ronald T. Ross, Ronald T. Ross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the “content of reasonable foreseeability must inevitably keep pace with advances in technology and general awareness of such advances” (citation omitted)
• stating that \a conditional guilty plea is only appropriate when the matter preserved for appeal is case-dispositive and requires no further factual development\
• rejecting the Government’s request for a remand to expand the record after the defendant prevailed on appeal pursuant to a conditional plea
• rejecting the Government’s request for a remand to expand the record after the defendant prevailed on appeal pursuant to a conditional plea
• drawing no clear distinction between the foreseeability of a wire transmission and the foreseeability of an interstate wire transmission in holding that the government had presented insufficient evidence to show the foreseeability of any wire transmissions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).