Eighth Circuit· 2/28/2006
United States v. Robert Berni
Citations
- 439 F.3d 990
- 2006 WL 463173
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the non-reviewability rule survived Booker, 543 U.S. at 220
- reaching opposite conclusion, though examining district court’s assessment of defendant’s cooperation as part of review of sentence’s reasonableness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Melloy, Fagg, Benton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. McCraneyEighth Circuit· 2010-07-22· cited 33×
- United States v. Edward Moore, Also Known as Andrew Moore, Also Known as MoEighth Circuit· 2007-04-16· cited 29×
- United States v. BillueEighth Circuit· 2009-07-23· cited 19×
- United States v. Mashica SpannSeventh Circuit· 2012-05-29· cited 13×
- United States v. Edward MooreEighth Circuit· 2007-04-16
- United States v. Martin Jermaine BillueEighth Circuit· 2009-07-23
- United States v. MartinezEighth Circuit· 2007-12-07
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court· 2004-10-01· cited 23,210×
- United States v. Darrin Todd HaackEighth Circuit· 2005-04-13· cited 681×
- United States v. Arend MathijssenEighth Circuit· 2005-05-02· cited 121×
- United States v. Arlene Marie FrokjerEighth Circuit· 2005-07-20· cited 106×
- United States v. Connie GoodwinEighth Circuit· 1995-12-21· cited 45×
- United States v. Jimmy Dwayne MorellEighth Circuit· 2005-12-01· cited 33×
- United States of America v. Sirree Muhammed RizaEighth Circuit· 2001-10-02· cited 29×
Other cases named United States v. Robert Berni
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.