Skip to main content
· 10/20/1986

United States v. Ringer

Citations

  • 651 F. Supp. 636
  • 1986 WL 11992
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18860

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to reject defendant’s allegations of disruption to his business, which government argued were “self-serving” and “unsubstantiated.”
  • factor neutral as between Chicago and New York

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Getzendanner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.