United States v. Rigoberto Carrasco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that evidence of activities independent of the charged drug offenses (i.e., “evidence of [other] drug dealings” and of the de- fendant’s “alleged operation of a tire business as a front for drug operations”) were admitted in error under Rule 404(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).