United States v. Riesselman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant's statements were sufficiently attenuated where Government did not question defendant solely about unlawfully obtained evidence but also confronted him with a confidential informant's statements and weapons found at his residence
• holding that defendant’s statements were sufficiently attenuated where Government did not question defendant solely about unlawfully obtained evidence but also confronted him with a confidential informant’s statements and weapons found at his residence
• concluding that “Attachment 1” was sufficient for incorporation
• concluding that “Attachment 1” was sufficient for incorporation
• finding the confession was not a product of the suppressed drugs in part because the defendant was also confronted with legally discovered weapons and drug transactions
• finding the confession was not a product of the suppressed drugs in part because the defendant’s only evidence that his confession was influenced by the illegal seizure was his own self-serving testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).