Skip to main content
· 9/26/1969

United States v. Riehle

Citations

  • 18 C.M.A. 603
  • 18 USCMA 603
  • 40 C.M.R. 315
  • 1969 CMA LEXIS 691
  • 1969 WL 6100

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “[e]xcessive precipitation was the root cause of the flooding experienced by plaintiffs”
  • noting that “the' issue of what constitutes a ‘taking’ is a ‘federal question’ governed entirely by federal law, but ... the meaning of ‘property’ as used by the Fifth Amendment will normally obtain its content by reference to state law”
  • finding public-figure analysis an \ill-fitting mold\ and rejecting it for the public-interest test
  • finding public-figure analysis an “ill-fitting mold” and rejecting it for the public-interest test
  • analyzing harms of dam operation causing raised water levels on adjacent farms against benefits of control at all other periods of same dam
  • analyzing harms of dam operation causing raised water levels on adjacent farms against benefits of control at all other periods of same dam

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Darden, Ferguson, Quinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.