United States v. Ridglea State Bank, United States of America v. Bank of Commerce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that guilty intent of an agent acting for the benefit of his employer will be imputed to the employer when the latter is sought to be held liable under a statute requiring knowledge or guilty intent
• basing its holding, at least in part, on the disparity between the recovery sought and the Government’s actual losses
• knowledge or guilty intent of agent not imputed to employer when latter is sought to be held liable under a statute requiring knowledge or guilty intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).