United States v. Rickus, Robert F. United States of America v. Nazarok, Dennis M. Appeal of United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “objective facts of this case certainly justified the officers in concluding that there was a fair probability that evidence of a burglary would be found in the car”
• noting that area recently victimized by twelve unsolved burglaries was area of criminal activity for Terry purposes
• holding, inter alia, that federal law applied to defendant’s motion to suppress evidence found pursuant to search of the trunk of his car
• holding, inter alia, that federal law applied to defendant’s motion to suppress evidence found pursuant to search of the trunk of his car
• noting “evidence obtained in accordance with federal law is admissible in federal court – even though it was obtained by state officers in violation of state law”
• \The reputation of an area for criminal activity is an articulable fact upon which a police officer may legitimately rely.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).