United States v. Richard Willoughby, Quintin Prioleau, Arthur Prioleau, and Carleton Montgomery

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that incarceration does not necessarily constitute Miranda “custody”
• holding that incarceration does not necessarily constitute Miranda \custody\
• “Mistaking the degree of intrusion of which probable eavesdroppers are capable is not at all the same thing as believing there are no eavesdroppers.”
• concerning a conversation that was “automatically recorded” because it “took place while [the defendant] was holding the . . . telephone’s handset off the hook”
• rejecting contention that pretrial detainees have reasonable expectation of privacy in calls to non- attorneys from institutional telephones
• upholding a 19 policy calling for a visual bodily cavity search “whenever an inmate leaves or returns to the unit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).