Skip to main content
· 1/29/1979

United States v. Richard William Landof

Citations

  • 591 F.2d 36

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the mere presence of a third-party who is acting as an agent of the client does not necessarily destroy the attorney-client privilege
  • “But, the law is clear that recollection can be refreshed from documents made by persons other than the witness.”
  • use of FBI report to refresh recollection permitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trask, Sneed, Skopil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.