· 1/29/1979
United States v. Richard William Landof
Citations
- 591 F.2d 36
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the mere presence of a third-party who is acting as an agent of the client does not necessarily destroy the attorney-client privilege
- “But, the law is clear that recollection can be refreshed from documents made by persons other than the witness.”
- use of FBI report to refresh recollection permitted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Trask, Sneed, Skopil
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.