United States v. Richard Wesley Elliott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding informant credible because he had 1 provided “six reliable drug-related tips”
• “Where there are two permissible views of the evidence, the factfinder’s choice between them cannot be clearly erroneous.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• “Where there are two permissible views of the evidence, the factfinder’s choice between them cannot be clearly erroneous.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• ‘Where there are two permissible views of the evidence, the factfinder’s choice between them cannot be clearly erroneous.” (quoting United States v. Working, 224 F.3d 1093, 1102 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).