Skip to main content
· 3/1/2002

United States v. Richard W. Canestraro

Citations

  • 282 F.3d 427
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 3283
  • 2002 WL 312881

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a “success fee” also constitutes a separate gratuity
  • holding that a “success fee” also constitutes a separate gratuity
  • holding that a “success fee” also constitutes a separate gratuity
  • discussing analogous provision in USSG § 2C1.2(b)(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy, Moore, Cole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.