United States v. Richard Thomas Stitt, A/K/A Patrick v. Hardy, A/K/A Tom Tom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the jury need not unan imously agree on the five persons requirement of CCE and likening the requirement to unnamed co-conspirators under the law of conspiracy
• finding admission of improper evidence harmless in death penalty case where such evidence \comprised only a fraction of the total testimony heard during the penalty phase\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).