United States v. Richard Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that omission of confidential informant's criminal history did not undermine probable cause finding
• reviewing district court’s denial of motion to suppress for clear error
• “[A] deficiency in one factor may be compensated for by a strong showing in another or by some other indication of reliability.”
• “[A] deficiency in one factor may be compensated for by a strong showing in another or by some other indication of reliability.”
• after a Franks hearing, holding that the omission of an informant's criminal background and financial motive was not essential to the probable cause determination where the detailed affidavit had been extensively corrobo- rated
• “[A]n informant’s criminality 20 No. 17-2734 does not in itself establish unreliability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).