United States v. Richard Poirier, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a theft of confidential information constituted a deprivation of property
• noting that the 2000 amendments left intact Application Note 14 to § 2F1.1
• rejecting claim that indictment was insufficient for failing to allege that unlawfully transmitted documents were confidential because “[ojther parts of the indictment made it evident that the property involved was certain confidential information.”
• rejecting claim that indictment was insufficient for failing to allege that unlawfully transmitted documents were confidential because \[o]ther parts of the indictment made it evident that the property involved was certain confidential information.\
• “Minor deficiencies that do not prejudice the defendant will not prompt this Court to reverse a conviction.”
• \Minor deficiencies that do not prejudice the defendant will not prompt this Court to reverse a conviction.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).