Skip to main content
· 2/19/2004

United States v. Richard Plotts

Citations

  • 359 F.3d 247
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 2791
  • 2004 WL 309058

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the district court’s error was “clear and obvious” where “the weight of appellate authority” indicated that violation of the allocution right constitutes plain error
  • reading Adams as setting out an unqualified rule for Olano 's fourth prong
  • reading Adams as setting out an unqualified rule for Olano 's fourth prong

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scirica, Nygaard, Ambro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.