Skip to main content
· 4/7/2021

United States v. Richard Parker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that allegations of a death resulting from lack of treatment constituted a medical negligence claim where the death was alleged to have resulted from on-call doctors failing to respond
  • where a request 12 was made for help from a GI doctor, the on-call doctors’ failure to respond stated medical negligence
  • “Irreparable harm can be shown where a court incorrectly denies a motion to dismiss for failure to follow pre-suit requirements, as doing so would eliminate the cost-saving features the Act was intended to create.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.