United States v. Richard Mohr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s “statement ‘I think I should get [a lawyer]’ was not an unequivocal invocation of his right to counsel”
• holding that a defendant’s statement, “I think I should get a lawyer,” was equivocal
• holding “I think I should get [a lawyer]” was not a sufficient invocation of the right -12- #28583 to counsel
• finding no Fifth Amendment violation where officers asked the defendant if they could record an interview, defendant stated he wanted his lawyer if police were going to record the interview, and police proceeded with an unrecorded interview
• \Should I get a lawyer at this time? . . . I think I should get one.\
• “to the extent [petitioner] . . . has not been given credit against his federal sentence for prior time served, his remedy would be to seek a writ of habeas corpus.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).