Skip to main content
· 10/2/2006

United States v. Richard Lee Long

Citations

  • 464 F.3d 569
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 24584
  • 2006 WL 2795053

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that there is “no cognizable Fourth Amendment” claim when there is no search or seizure
  • finding useful in analysis that “[i]f the caller turned out to have been lying, the police could have confronted him immediately”
  • describing as one of the supporting facts for reasonable suspicion “the arrival of the truck in the predicted time frame traveling in the predicted direction”
  • declining to reach argument that handcuffing was not appropriate during a Terry stop because there was probable cause to arrest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin, Gilman, Sargus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.