United States v. Richard Lee Bast and Redex Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The words ‘surreptitious interception’ connote! ], in plain and ordinary usage, ‘secret listening.’ ” (footnote omitted)
• “The words ‘surreptitious interception’ connote[], in plain and ordinary usage, ‘secret listening.’” (footnote omitted)
• “The words ‘surreptitious interception’ connote[], in plain and ordinary usage, ‘secret listening.’” (footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).