United States v. Richard Kenneth Wallen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Findings that are in plain contradiction of the videotape evidence constitute clear error.”
• the subjective motivations of police are irrelevant to determining whether a search or seizure is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment
• the subjective motivations of police are irrelevant to determining whether a search or seizure is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment
• the subjective motivations of police are irrelevant to determining whether a search or seizure is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment
• the subjective motivations of police are irrelevant to determining whether a search or seizure is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment
• officer knew the defendant had three weapons in his truck and admitted he lacked documentation for them, the defendant disobeyed the officer’s instructions to remain at the rear of his vehicle, the stop occurred at night, and the defendant was barefoot

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).