United States v. Richard J. Leary, and F.L. Kleinberg & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that warrants must “allow the executing officers to distinguish between items that may and may not be seized”
• holding that warrants must “allow the executing officers to distinguish between items that may and may not be seized”
• requiring that a warrant be limited, if possible, to the specific transaction under suspicion and to specific companies under suspicion
• noting that agents are not expected to “anticipate legal determination or resolve ambiguities in the law”
• noting that agents are not expected to \anticipate legal determination or resolve ambiguities in the law\
• holding impermissibly overbroad a warrant authorizing search of company offices and seizure of all records and communications “relating to the purchase, sale and illegal exportation of materials” in violation of federal export laws

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).