United States v. Richard F. Tylkowski and Timothy P. Tylkowski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that courts must “analyz[e] each instance 10 where the adverse inference was drawn, or not drawn, on a case-by-case basis under the 11 microscope of the circumstances of that particular civil litigation”
• holding even threats of discipline would suffice
• \Evidence of another crime which tends to undermine the defendant’s innocent explanations for his act will be admitted.\
• “[T]he government was entitled to introduce the challenged weapons to rebut Richard’s claim that [he] lacked the requisite knowledge of the contents of the sealed boxes.”
• circum- stantial evidence of defendant’s control over a box sufficient to support the reasonable inference that he knew it con- tained illegally converted machine guns with obliterated serial numbers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).