United States v. Richard Earl Hodges

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the concealment element was satisfied where an untruthful statement was given to the authorities
• making an untruthful statement to conceal an offense is an affirmative act sufficient to sustain a misprision charge
• district court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion for mistrial where prosecution made reference in cross-examination to defendant’s kidnapping conviction but court immediately instructed jury to disregard the matter and it did not appear that jury was improperly influenced

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).