United States v. Richard David

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no prejudice where claimant “points to no witnesses or evidence that have been lost as a result of the delay”
• describing Kotteakos as ʺconstruing the ʹsubstantial rightsʹ language of 28 U.S.C. § 391 (from which Rule 61 is derived), as requiring an assessment of ʹwhether the error itself had substantial influenceʹ on the outcome of the case.ʺ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).