United States v. Richard Daniel Freeman, Robert Temp and Alaine Carter Temp, Defendants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding witnesses’ testimony about their “‘impression’ and ‘understanding’ of appellants’ relationship to each other” was admissible lay opinion testimony
• objection that indictment lacked specificity required by the Sixth Amendment was waived by failure to object before trial
• “Appellants' contention that the indictment lacked the specificity required by the sixth amendment was waived by their failure to object before trial.”
• “An attorney’s involvement in, or recommendation of, a transaction does not place a cloak of secrecy around all the incidents of such 'a transaction.”
• instruction that “ ‘it is reasonable to infer that a person ordinarily intends the natural and probable consequences of his or her knowing acts,’ ” held to create a permissive inference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).