Skip to main content
· 3/24/1995

United States v. Richard Coluccio, Theresa Coluccio, Claimant-Appellant

Citations

  • 51 F.3d 337
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 6140

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that third party made prima facie 8 showing of standing to challenge writ of execution under FDCPA
  • holding that general creditors do not have standing to contest forfeitures
  • noting that the benefit the judgment debtor received from the property was significantly less “direct and tangible” than the benefit involved in other cases and remanding to the district court for further findings
  • noting that the benefit the judgment debtor received from the property 17 was significantly less “direct and tangible” than the benefit involved in other cases and remanding 18 to the district court for further findings
  • funds in constructive trust are co-owned property
  • analogizing to civil forfeiture laws

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cardamone, Pierce, Miner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.