United States v. Richard Batiste

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the district court was not required to hold an evidentiary hearing on the defendant’s motion to suppress where the defendant failed to dispute any material fact in the government’s proffer
• noting the “well-settled principle that a district court has broad discretion to manage its own calendar”
• “ultimate responsibility for the effective working of the adversary system rests with the trial judge;” noting relevance of time constraints in trial court’s exercise of discretion in granting evidentiary hearings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).