United States v. Richard Anglada

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no apparent connection between criminal charges pending used to justify assertion of privilege and incident on which testimony was sought
• “The heart of [the reasonable doubt instruction] was appropriate enough, but the somewhat confusing parable of the father and a bundle of twigs and the apparent characterization of the standard as quantitative rather than qualitative both might better have been omitted.”
• sticks missing from bundle of twigs was improper quantitative example

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).