Skip to main content
· 5/24/1989

United States v. Richard Algie Missick

Citations

  • 875 F.2d 1294
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 7490
  • 1989 WL 56230

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • section 1801(f)(2) does not apply to acquisition of content of telephone calls where one of the parties consented
  • section 1801(f )(2) does not apply to acquisition of content of telephone calls where one of the parties consented
  • co-conspirators may be subject to enhanced sentences under Pinkerton liability theory
  • co-conspirators may be subject to enhanced sentences under Pinkerton liability theory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Cummings, Easterbrook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.