United States v. Richard A. Carroll

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding microfilm copies of checks admissible under section 1732 and Rules 1003 and 1004 to prove contents of missing originals
• construing Rules 1003 and 1004 to support admissibility of microfilms of checks

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).