Skip to main content
First Circuit· 12/18/2000

United States v. Richard

Citations

  • 234 F.3d 763
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 32128
  • 2000 WL 1836042

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that money laundering can occur with proceeds derived from “a completed phase of an ongoing offense”
  • concluding defendant’s acquittal on predicate offense of bankruptcy fraud did not require reversal of his conviction for money laundering
  • finding no plain error even though a majority of circuits had adopted the interpretation of a statute urged by the defendant
  • upholding money laundering convictions even though defen- dant had been acquitted of specified unlawful activity
  • looking to how the money-laundering statutes use \proceeds\ to determine when \proceeds\ are generated
  • proceeds laundered in money laundering may result from “a completed phase of an ongoing offense ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Wallace, Boudin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.