First Circuit· 12/18/2000
United States v. Richard
Citations
- 234 F.3d 763
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 32128
- 2000 WL 1836042
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that money laundering can occur with proceeds derived from “a completed phase of an ongoing offense”
- concluding defendant’s acquittal on predicate offense of bankruptcy fraud did not require reversal of his conviction for money laundering
- finding no plain error even though a majority of circuits had adopted the interpretation of a statute urged by the defendant
- upholding money laundering convictions even though defen- dant had been acquitted of specified unlawful activity
- looking to how the money-laundering statutes use \proceeds\ to determine when \proceeds\ are generated
- proceeds laundered in money laundering may result from “a completed phase of an ongoing offense ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Wallace, Boudin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.