United States v. Ricardo Ferrera

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the district court’s denial of a defendant’s Rule 15 motion for a telephonic deposition was not an abuse of discretion, noting, among other things, “the somewhat tangential focus and generalized character of the offer of proof’
• undertaking a totality-of-the-circumstances type analysis vis-á-vis a defendant’s motion for a telephonic deposition
• no plain <br>error where very little prejudice resulted from improper remark in <br>government's opening statement
• amount of restitution reduced because district court’s order lacked support in the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).