United States v. Ricardo Alvarez Gutierrez, Jorge Eliecer Palacio, Jairo Rendon, Osmundo Roque, Jose Palma-Rodriguez, Manuel Palma-Rodriguez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[B]ecause this is not a case in which the informant acted as a mere tipster, to permit nondisclosure of the informant’s identity requires further consideration.”
• “Mere conjecture about the possible relevance of [the Cl’s] testimony is insufficient to compel disclosure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).