United States v. Ricardo A. Montoya, D/B/A Ram Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is not
• “[Ijgnorance of the federal presence does not negate the requisite mens rea for a § 287 violation — the intent to present a fraudulent claim.”
• \[I]gnorance of the federal presence does not negate the requisite mens rea for aS 287 violation -- the intent to present a fraudulent claim.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).