United States v. R&F Properties of Lake County, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that direct first-hand knowledge was satisfied by nurse practitioner who worked for defendant and had explicit conversations about billing practices with office manager
• holding that a relator in an FCA case presented enough evidence to “raise an issue of fact as to [] falsity” despite ambiguous regulatory language
• holding that Rule 9(b) was satisfied where the relator, a nurse employed by the defendant, had conversations about the defendant’s billing practices with the defendant’s office manager
• holding that a nurse practitioner em- ployed by the defendant who was responsible for billing her ser- vices and who discussed billing practices with the office adminis- trator did not need to identify representative claims
• holding that the relator sufficiently pled submission of false claims because she al- leged that she was personally involved in improper billing and was told by another employee that this type of billing was common practice
• holding at least one personal discussion regarding defendants billing practices and being told how the defendants bill the government sufficient to support an allegation of a fraudulent claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).