Skip to main content
· 10/9/1981

United States v. Reza Sedigh and William D. Brooks, Defendants-Apellants

Citations

  • 658 F.2d 1010
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 16985
  • 9 Fed. R. Serv. 33

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “trial court’s duty in deciding a motion for a new trial when jury misconduct is alleged must be judged on the peculiar facts and circumstances of each ease”
  • where allegations of juror misconduct “remain speculative the trial court need not inquire further”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thornberry, Reavley, Politz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.