United States v. Reyes Fabian Olivera-Mendez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a twenty-five-second delay to “ask[ ] three brief [unrelated] questions” did not violate the Fourth Amendment
• concluding that length of stop was not unreasonable and stating that routine “tasks took longer than normal because [the vehicle’s driver] presented unusual circumstances”
• finding that “three brief questions” that extended the stop by “twenty-five seconds” did not constitute an unreasonable seizure
• concluding fifteen minutes wait- ing for dispatcher to respond with results of a name check was reasonable
• concluding fifteen minutes wait- ing for dispatcher to respond with results of a name check was reasonable
• holding, in the alternative, that evidence discovered after a dog sniff should not be suppressed because the dog sniff, and not an earlier arguably unreasonable extension of the traffic stop, caused the discovery of the contraband

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).