Skip to main content
· 3/2/1989

United States v. Rex G. Endicott

Citations

  • 869 F.2d 452
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2491
  • 1989 WL 16692

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding “definitive corroboration” of a challenged witness’ testimony existed where every interaction between the defendant and witness was recorded
  • no reasonable likelihood false testimony as to witness payments would have affected the judgment of the jury where tape recording of contacts between witness and defendant presented definitive corroboration
  • new trial unwarranted where new evidence that government witness was promised more money than previously disclosed was cumulative
  • new trial not warranted where undisclosed evidence provided additional but cumulative ground of impeachment and where conviction was supported by substantial independent evidence
  • requir- ing defendant to establish actual prejudice resulting from an improper juror contact in order to receive a new trial
  • juror approaches main defense witness and says that he knows defendant is guilty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright, Tang, Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.