United States v. Resendez-Gonzalez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• tolling the statute of limitations because “allowing Opt-In Plaintiffs’ claims to diminish or expire due to circumstances beyond their direct control would be particularly unjust.”
• granting a request to equitably toll a statute of limitations when the “interests of justice [were] best served” by the tolling
• stating the doctrine of equitable tolling “permits courts to extend statutes of limitations on a case-by-case basis in order to prevent inequity.”
• tolling statute of limitations for potential opt-in plaintiffs who had not yet received notice of the action
• tolling the FLSA’s statute of limitations for potential opt-in plaintiffs from the date of plaintiffs’ motion for judicial notice until 90 days after such notice is received
• tolling the FLSA's statute of limitations for potential opt-in plaintiffs from the date of plaintiffs’ motion for judicial notice until 90 days after such notice is received

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).