Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 5/17/2012

United States v. Replogle

Citations

  • 678 F.3d 940
  • 2012 WL 1724251
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 9896

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there was no “obvious” Tapia error where “[d]eterrence, respect for the law, and protection of the public were the dominant factors in the district court’s analysis” and the district court’s reference to the defendant’s treatment was “fleeting”
  • holding no “obvious” Tapia violation where “[d]eterrence, respect for the law, and protection of the public were the dominant factors in the district court’s analysis”
  • finding no Tapia violation when the district court imposed imprisonment term immediately after discussing the offense conduct and the need for deterrence and protecting the public from the defendant
  • finding an appellant who raised some chal- lenges to the substantive and procedural reasonableness of his sen- tence forfeited the rehabilitation issue by not raising it in his initial appellate brief
  • \We are not convinced that the court's fleeting reference to whether [defendant] might be 'treated better somewhere else' demonstrates an obvious violation of § 3582(a) and the holding of Tapia .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Chief Judge, Melloy and Colloton, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.