United States v. Rentas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that in the “information age . . . the privacy that litigants once enjoyed as a practical matter has been diminished greatly already and will be eroded still further in the near future”
• “If we are to have a policy of protecting the names of individual litigants from public disclosure, there is a very substantial interest in doing so on a basis of equality.”
• “[P]laintiff’s claim of threatened harm is speculative and exaggerated and . . . the public interest in access to her identity outweighs her desire to pursue this case in relative secrecy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).