United States v. Rene De La Rosa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “evidence of a prior acquittal will often be excludable . . . because its probative value likely will be ‘substantially outweighed by the danger of prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury’” (quoting Fed. R. Evid. 403)
• “We have squarely held that, as a general matter, a trial court does not abuse its discretion in excluding evidence of a prior acquittal on a related charge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).