United States v. Remys Robles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that sentencing er- rors are harmless when we “know with certainty beyond a reason- able doubt what the district court would do upon remand”
• recognizing that sentencing errors are harmless when we “know with certainty beyond a reasonable doubt what the district court would do upon remand”
• explaining that sentencing errors are harmless when we know with certainty “what the district court would do upon remand”
• noting that “[w]hen the error is of the constitutional variety, a higher standard is applied” than when the error is nonconstitutional
• finding Booker error harmless because an alternative, identical sentence was imposed
• district courts are not required to conduct an accounting of every factor and explain the role each played in the sentencing decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).