United States v. Reiter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where a party has failed to move for j.n.o.v., we will not review the sufficiency of the evidence and direct a verdict for them...”
• “[W]e have not yet held that a consumer survey is mandatory to establish likelihood of confusion in a Lanham Act case and do not so hold in this case.”
• “Where a party has failed to [renew its motion for judgment as a matter of law], we will not review the sufficiency of the evidence . . . .” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).